<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: What does google want ? (or researching the territory)</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nop90.net/2007/12/13/what-does-google-want-or-researching-the-territory/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nop90.net/2007/12/13/what-does-google-want-or-researching-the-territory/</link>
	<description>My ramblings about blackhat seo and other stuff</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 17:21:54 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: piratescurvy</title>
		<link>http://nop90.net/2007/12/13/what-does-google-want-or-researching-the-territory/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>piratescurvy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Dec 2007 05:01:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nop90.net/2007/12/13/what-does-google-want-or-researching-the-territory/#comment-38</guid>
		<description>nop, can you explain further what kind of technique you use other than "throw shit at the wall" like most blackhats.

I remember on one of your posts in syndk8 you said something like:

big sites with millions of pages is like using a machine gun. highly innacurate, waste of ammo.

small targeted sites is like using a sniper rifle, efficient one hit kills.

So if you use small, targeted sites. Does it make more sense to rank a few parasites for short-mid tail keywords or should it be lots of small, fresh new domains for long tail?

hope that made sense...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>nop, can you explain further what kind of technique you use other than &#8220;throw shit at the wall&#8221; like most blackhats.</p>
<p>I remember on one of your posts in syndk8 you said something like:</p>
<p>big sites with millions of pages is like using a machine gun. highly innacurate, waste of ammo.</p>
<p>small targeted sites is like using a sniper rifle, efficient one hit kills.</p>
<p>So if you use small, targeted sites. Does it make more sense to rank a few parasites for short-mid tail keywords or should it be lots of small, fresh new domains for long tail?</p>
<p>hope that made sense&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: taky</title>
		<link>http://nop90.net/2007/12/13/what-does-google-want-or-researching-the-territory/#comment-37</link>
		<dc:creator>taky</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Dec 2007 23:52:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nop90.net/2007/12/13/what-does-google-want-or-researching-the-territory/#comment-37</guid>
		<description>once again nop, great post. 

i enjoy your posts because you dont give specifics, you aim moreso at changing the way people think rather than giving them the latest bh technique or script.

inspiring. taky.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>once again nop, great post. </p>
<p>i enjoy your posts because you dont give specifics, you aim moreso at changing the way people think rather than giving them the latest bh technique or script.</p>
<p>inspiring. taky.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
